data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5cb94/5cb949bd5fd6566d870425228777f78482080e6a" alt=""
Last Monday, the
Supreme Court heard oral arguments on a case that could affect the application of
Miranda warnings. The case is out of
Florida and involves the case of Kevin Dwayne Powell. Powell was convicted of
Unlawful Possession of a Firearm. After he was arrested, Powell told the police he had purchased the
gun for $150 "off the street" for protection. Before he made the confession Powell signed a
Miranda waiver which did not state that he had a right to have a lawyer present with him during questioning. The
Miranda waiver only stated that he had a right to a lawyer before answering any questions. The
Florida Supreme Court overturned the conviction on the basis that the police did not adequately warn Powell that he had a right to a lawyer during questioning. The
Florida Attorney General's Office argued that the warnings given to Powell "expresses all the rights required under
Miranda." Powell's lawyer argued that the warnings given to Powell gave him the impression that once the questioning started he no longer had a right to consult with an attorney.
This is the third
Miranda case case argued before the
Supreme Court this year. With these cases, the
Supreme Court has a chance to make significant changes to our understanding of the
Miranda warnings. All three decisions are expected to be released next year.
The case is Florida v. Powell, 08-1175.
For more information about the Chicago criminal defense attorneys at Legal Defenders, P.C., visit us at
www.thelegaldefenders.com or call us anytime at 1-800-228-7295.